I heard a radio ad about solving IRS problems. “It’s a fact that when you owe $10,000 or more, the IRS can take your car, your house . . . even your freedom.” The advertiser went on to say that its professionals reduce tax liabilities in amounts of “70, 80, even 90 percent of what’s owed.”
This is good marketing at one level: it creates anxious images and thoughts in the listeners’ minds and points them to relief. But the message is misleading.

IRS Won’t Arrest You For $10,000 Owing
Is it a “fact” that the IRS can put you in jail if you owe $10,000 or more? Not entirely. The IRS can prosecute you for tax crimes, the jury can convict you, and federal marshals will put you in jail. And there is no lower dollar limit to tax crimes. So yes, it’s possible to go to jail with only $10,000 owing. But tax crimes always involve some other behavior than merely owing taxes. You won’t go to jail just because you owe $10,000; you might go to jail because of how you came to owe $10,000, and what you did to avoid paying it.
The IRS doesn’t usually spend resources prosecuting crimes on such small liabilities. This doesn’t mean it can’t. It’s just very unlikely.
Similarly, the IRS isn’t about to take your car or house for owing $10,000. Those actions require a lot of bureaucratic review, and only occur as a last resort after the taxpayer refuses to speak to the IRS reasonably.

Percentage Of Tax Reduced Means Nothing
I’m sure the tax-resolution service touting the “70, 80, even 90 percent of what’s owed” gets results like that on occasion. The IRS will compromise your liability if you can show that you can’t pay it – that process is the Offer in Compromise. And comparing the original liability to the amount paid through the offer might result in a 90 percent reduction.
But the IRS doesn’t care how much liability is being written off. It cares how much you can pay. For instance, when I was at the IRS, I approved an Offer in Compromise that wrote off a $500 million tax debt in exchange for a $500 payment – more than a 99.99 percent reduction! Of course, that’s difficult to replicate: the taxpayer had been a president of a Savings and Loan in the 1980s, living large until the feds brought down his financial institution, and the government figured that collecting $500 from his nephew was preferable to keeping the assessment open until he died in jail.
People who listen to these ads call me to ask by what percentage I can reduce their tax, and I can’t answer. I need to study their financial situation before suggesting amounts. And that just doesn’t sound as gripping on a radio ad. But, please remember, if radio ad promises sound too good to be true for your particular situation, they probably are.